J. Burden is a young American. He is the member of the robust, intellectual and educated right (well-read right). In his substack, he contemplates the definition:
“Left and Right are modern terms. This French Revolution where one side of the French legislature, the conservative side, was on the right and the revolutionary one was on the left. In the pre-modern era, the left-right dichotomy broke down. Nonetheless, it's a very real one in our current age. My take on this is a pretty normal one. I believe the left stands for equality and the right stands for hierarchy.”
The Protestant Roots of Equality in America
The following sentence was the product of the creative collaboration of the two protestant masons, Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
When you think about the American founding ideology, it must be understood in the context of these two religions, protestant and masonic. Masons carried on the goals of the French Revolution: Liberté, égalité, fraternité (the égalité part). The idea of equality was a strong (perhaps the strongest) ideological current in the protestant rebellion. It was the resistance against the hierarchical Papacy. America was an exodus from the tyranny of the hierarchical, centralized, parasitic and dictatorial Rome.
The founding fathers didn’t believe in the material equality and the redistribution of wealth. Calvinist believed in predestination, wealth being a sign of being chosen. Material equality was a Marxist innovation following the trauma of the industrial revolution.
The Christian Roots of Equality
The Protestant rebellion, of course, appealed to founding ideas in Christianity. I spoke about this in the podcast: Sound No. 12 – מיהו יהודי and the Jerusalem Council.
Apostles Paul (Shaul from the tribe of Benjamin) and Barnabas (Joseph Halevy) were the founding ideologues of Christianity. As a shortcut, people say that Paul created, authored the Christian ethos. Paul and Barnabas were part of the frum “ultra-Orthodox” diaspora. Both came from abroad to study in Israel, Paul from Tarsus and Barnabas from Cypress, both attended the famous yeshiva of Rabban Gamliel. They were, if you will, the original meshichists. We must mention that ideas of equality were already brooding in the yeshiva of the elitist and dictatorial Rabban Gamliel, he was impeached and deposed. As described in Talmud, Gemoroh Brochos:
“On that day several benches were added to the study hall to accommodate the numerous students. Rabbi Yoḥanan said: Abba Yosef ben Dostai and the Rabbis disputed this matter. One said: Four hundred benches were added to the study hall. And one said: Seven hundred benches were added to the study hall.”
Paul was not content with a little yeshiva insurrection. He had bigger plans. He wanted to take the equality to the extreme, on a global scale. Paul proclaimed that belief in one God and His Messenger (AKA meshichism) is no longer a tribal religion. There is no difference between a Yid and a Goy. He deliberately took down the tribal boundary of kashrus and bris. The brother of Jesus Apostle James (Reb Yaakov), the Rebbe of the messianic sect in Jerusalem at the time, didn’t agree. But Paul and Barnabas outvoted James (podcast).
A very fast-forward to the post-Protestant America. No differences now between the races and even the sexes. The ultimate triumph of the religion of equality. Trans everything! Post human. See what you started, Reb Paul?
I'm getting dizzy…
A Break in the Equality Matrix
And here, gently, we approach the elephant in the room. Because the equality is unnatural, it contradicts hieratical nature. When the proponents of the religion gain power, they have to violently censor ideas and people to sustain the narrative (which is technically the opposite of the diversity, equity, and inclusion). There is no “change” but the promoters of the false equality have to overcompensate and promise that the progress of the radically different world is just around the corner, when “the lion and the lamb” are in prefect harmony.
Papal Rome: The First Ecumenical Council of Nicaea proclaimed hyper equality. Not only is there no difference between the goyim and the Jews (who are now exempt from the mitzvos), there is not even a difference between God the Father and God the Son. This is known in Chabad as elokism or the standard Catholic Trinity. Significantly, the Emperor Constantin went along with extreme fanatics. Extreme always wins. Centuries of oppressions against Arians followed. Arius of Alexandria dared to teach that God the Father and God the Son are hierarchical to each other. Which is the traditional Jewish interpretation of the Mashiyach.
Genocide of Cathars: Papal war against neo Gnostics in the South of France. What was the problem with the Cathars, besides the insubordination to Rome? Ancient Jewish kabbalistic ideas of the celestial hierarchy.
Calvinist State: Even protestants when in power had to restore to violence to defend the “equality”. This is most notable because the American founders were successors to Calvinist ideas. The Calvinist State in Geneva excelled in torture and violence.
CCCP: While communists pursued the destruction of traditional boundaries of family and society and paid lip service to equality, they defended the religion of equality with the brutally and on a scale unknown to man. There is nothing “equal” about the cult of Stalin often emulated in Chabad. This violence followed communism absolutely in every instance.
Post Trump America: The class loosely defined as the Censorship Industrial Complex, the purveyors of the myth of the January 6th, Russian Collusion, etc. The more they preach the utopian equality, the more they have to censor the blowback from the oppressed people. In the case of January the 6th, imprison the dissenters in sham trials.
Border Patrol
Any borders between races, sexes, and countries is an obstacle to be removed for the idol worshipers of equality. San Francisco is the ultimate goal. They will not stop until the entire country is ruled by gangs and homeless. Breaking boundaries is the dead end! Literally. They will make you homeless!
But because the ideas of the said equality are baked into the American ethos, there is no clear out. The right retreats into fundamentalism, Catholicism, messianic Evangelicalism or Judaism and then gets trapped in the same equality rhetoric.
The right is watching the equality destroy America, unable to take a stand against the foundational idea. This will not stop until the destruction is complete. Welcome to the uniparty! The alternative, of course, as we operate in the world of linguistic PR gimmicks, is fascism. And no one wants to be a fascist. Civilization built for itself a rhetorical trap of the lesser understood concepts.
Equality Revolution in Chabad
Ramash was not content with the elitist ethnic Belarus religion of the Alter Rebbe and Rashab. He introduced ideas of equality. Chabad is trending more Morocco than Belarus now. Chabad operates as the servant of the globalist oligarchy, so it is inevitable that Chabad adapts to the ideas of its masters. The little video is the ultimate insult to the Alter Rebbe and all the kabbalists before him. The kabbalists saw the world as the hierarchical Tree of Life.
They took the Kabbalistic divine spark ממש and in a propagandistic flourish gave it to everybody! “Everyone got a spark”…
אַתָּה בְחַרְתָּנוּ מִכָּל הָעַמִּים אָהַבְתָּ אותָנוּ וְרָצִיתָ בָּנוּ וְרומַמְתָּנוּ מִכָּל הַלְּשׁונות וְקִדַּשְׁתָּנוּ בְּמִצְותֶיךָ וְקֵרַבְתָּנוּ מַלְכֵּנוּ לַעֲבודָתֶךָ וְשִׁמְךָ הַגָּדול וְהַקָּדושׁ עָלֵינוּ קָרָאתָ
There is little practical meaning in today's chasidic community It offers a leader who allegedly cares about his followers and a sense of community personified by the Rebbe.
Chabad has no Rebbe,no community as people of various background are thrown together.
They share little cultural,or otherwise commonality.
This Chabad today is a theological cholent,and a cultural cholent ,with little commonality save worship of their last leade